Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Journal 5: A Sequel for Fans Alone


      In “Silent Hill: Revelation 3D” by Nathan Rabin, it is reveals that the movie spent a lot of time explaining the story from the original film and the sequel, Silent Hill: Revelation 3D. Rabin goes on to reveal that Adelaide Clemens is perfect playing the main part and then reveals the background to the film. He believes that as a sequel to a film based on a video game, it holds too true to that nature. He claims that the film is too broken up, and the scenes tend to work more like episodes. As a fan of groundbreaking horror films, and those with interesting stories, I loved the original Silent Hill. Because of that, this sequel struck my eye at first glance. Unfortunately I have not seen it, and this review gives me less reason to. As a horror film based on a video game, Silent Hill relates quite closely to the Resident Evil film series. As these films continue, they tend to move more from horror movies to video game adaptions themselves; and so it seems to be the pattern in this mini-genre. Silent Hill: Revelation 3D appears to have a similar pattern of going from horror to action. With the exception of people with a hatred for video game sequencing, Silent Hill: Revelation 3D has an appeal to those who enjoy action horror films.

2 comments:

  1. I have actually never seen any of the Resident Evils or Silent Hills but have caught their previews many a time flipping channels. I haven't always been a a fan of these type of horror films that are very zombie monster oriented but being a movie lover might just have to give these a chance and see if I am indeed missing anything.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also along with Alex have never seen any of the Resident Evil films or Silent Hill films. I dont care for zombie movies or anytype of movie along that line. If I am to watch a horror film it will be one along the lines of Saw or one where the plot is based on a true story like Paranormal Activity movies.

    ReplyDelete